Entry tags:
No launch today
I know, I know... it's called rocket science for a reason. This stuff is complicated and hard.
But the real problem with the SLS is the rocket wasn't designed to generate thrust - it was designed to generate pork.
At this point they have enough hardware to generate... what, three launches? Then what? If you want to be serious about returning to space in a big way you need to either mass produce disposable engines or semi mass produce reusable rockets.
Damn, bring on the F1-B - the updated version of the classic F1-A engine that launched Apollo to the moon. Hire Elon to make them recoverable and reusable. I'm a child of the 60s and damn it I want my space station and my moon base.
-m
Will settle for a moon telescope base because... damn, the moon is dangerous.
But the real problem with the SLS is the rocket wasn't designed to generate thrust - it was designed to generate pork.
At this point they have enough hardware to generate... what, three launches? Then what? If you want to be serious about returning to space in a big way you need to either mass produce disposable engines or semi mass produce reusable rockets.
Damn, bring on the F1-B - the updated version of the classic F1-A engine that launched Apollo to the moon. Hire Elon to make them recoverable and reusable. I'm a child of the 60s and damn it I want my space station and my moon base.
-m
Will settle for a moon telescope base because... damn, the moon is dangerous.
no subject
All LHOX engines are 'reusable', they have to be because they all need to be tested before a real mission. The ones that are not 'reusable' are the ones that either melted themselves or exploded during testing. The problem is not 'reusable' it's recovering them after launch.
We can currently do that for a rocket designed for an Earth orbit. We have yet to work out how to do that for a rocket designed for a Moon orbit.
no subject
Millions of dollars of hardware destined for a watery grave. It just irritates me.
no subject
no subject